Monday, February 11, 2013



Ana Sucaldito
Mrs. Wilson
AP Multicultural Literature B
15 January 2013
Multiple Choice Questions for “The Poem as Mask”

Orpheus
When I wrote of the women in their dances  and                   
      wildness, it was a mask  ,                                                     
on their mountain , gold-hunting, singing , in orgy               
it was a mask ; when I wrote of  the god,                                  
fragmented, exiled from himself , his life, the love gone      
      down with song,                                                                
it was myself , split open, unable to speak, in exile from      
      myself.
             
There is no mountain, there is no god, there is memory
of my torn life, myself split open in sleep, the rescued
      child                                                               
beside me among the doctors, and a word
of rescue from the great eyes.
 
No more  masks! No more mythologies!
 
Now, for the first time, the god lifts his hand,
the fragments  join in me with their own music .
 
1.      The mask in “The Poem as Mask” is an example of the literary device:

A.    Caesura

B.     Allusion

C.     Hyperbaton

D.    Motif

E.     Litote

2.      The purpose of the imagery in Line 1-8 is to:

A.    Contrast the speaker’s dreams with his reality

B.     Establish the setting

C.     Describe the subject of what [Rukeyser] wrote” (1)

D.    Develop character

E.     Name the setting

3.      According to the speaker, who is “the god” (Line 4)?

A.    Orpheus

B.     The women

C.     The song

D.    The fragments

E.     Herself

4.      Using Line 15-16, the reader can infer removing the masks: 

A.    Resurrects the “fragmented” (7) god

B.     Further destroys the speaker

C.     Heals the speaker

D.    Causes the women on the mountain to sing

E.     Results in no change

5.   Line 14, “No more masks! No more mythologies” does all of the following:

I. Answers a question

II. Uses anaphora for emphasis

III. Varies the syntax to indicate a turning point

                                  A.      II only

                                   B.      I and II

                                   C.      II and III

                                  D.      I and III

                                   E.      I, II and III

Explanations to “The Poem as Mask” Questions

1.      Correct Answer: D

Why: Caesura, a pause, and hyperbaton, an inversion of word order, are both syntactical devices, so a noun like a mask, doesn’t apply. This eliminates A and C. Motif is a recurring theme of symbolic significance. Litote is a type of understatement, which never shows up in the poem, much less as the mask, ruling out E. Although the poem alludes to a myth and a poem, the mask isn’t included as an allusion. The mask holds symbolic significance and repeatedly shows up, making it a motif. So, answer D is right.

2.      Correct Answer: A

Why: Although the imagery does help to establish the character and setting (Choice B), it is not its main purpose. The subject and setting of Orpheus is only touched upon by the imagery (Choice C and E) while the imagery doesn’t touch on the development of character (Choice D).  Mainly, the imagery functions to describe Rukeyser’s ideal, the women “gold-hunting, singing . . .” (Line 3), so the answer is A.

3.      Correct Answer: E

Why: The speaker clearly states that the god “was myself” (Line 7), making the correct answer E. Though Orpheus is the god in the technical sense, it doesn’t apply to the particular line stated in the question (Choice A). The references to the women already concluded in the previous lines (Choice B), while the mentions of the song and the fragments come later in the piece, eliminating Choices C and D.

4.      Correct Answer: C

Why: Choice B is wrong because the poem ends with the “fragments join[ing] in [her]” (Line 16), conveying a sense of totality rather than destruction. Their unification also rejects E is an option. The women are never mentioned after Line 2, eliminating D. Although the god does return in this stanza, there is no textual evidence to support that he has been resurrected, eliminating A and making C the correct answer. The unification of the fragments and their ability to sing conveys that the speaker has become whole and has been healed.

5.      Correct Answer: C

Why: There are no questions anywhere in the poem, eliminating Option I. The repetition of “No more” at the beginning of each sentence underscores the speaker’s conviction, making Option II viable while the short sentences after the long run-ons draws attention to the speaker’s new conviction, making Option III correct as well. So, the right answer is C.

Sunday, February 10, 2013



Ana Sucaldito
Mrs. Wilson
AP Multicultural Literature B
15 January 2013
Multiple Choice Questions for The Phantom of the Opera

            As for Erik, he went to Asia Minor and thence to Constantinople, where he entered the Sultan's employment. In explanation of the services which he was able to render a monarch haunted by perpetual terrors, I need only say that it was Erik who constructed all the famous trap-doors and secret chambers and mysterious strong-boxes which were found at Yildiz-Kiosk after the last Turkish revolution. He also invented those automata, dressed like the Sultan and resembling the Sultan in all respects,[13] which made people believe that the Commander of the Faithful was awake at one place, when, in reality, he was asleep elsewhere. 
           See the interview of the special correspondent of the MATIN, with Mohammed-Ali Bey, on the day after the entry of the Salonika troops into Constantinople. 
          Of course, he had to leave the Sultan's service for the same reasons that made him fly from Persia: he knew too much. Then, tired of his adventurous, formidable and monstrous life, he longed to be some one "like everybody else." And he became a contractor, like any ordinary contractor, building ordinary houses with ordinary bricks. He tendered for part of the foundations in the Opera. His estimate was accepted. When he found himself in the cellars of the enormous playhouse, his artistic, fantastic, wizard nature resumed the upper hand. Besides, was he not as ugly as ever? He dreamed of creating for his own use a dwelling unknown to the rest of the earth, where he could hide from men's eyes for all time. 
          The reader knows and guesses the rest. It is all in keeping with this incredible and yet veracious story. Poor, unhappy Erik! Shall we pity him? Shall we curse him? He asked only to be "some one," like everybody else. But he was too ugly! And he had to hide his genius OR USE IT TO PLAY TRICKS WITH, when, with an ordinary face, he would have been one of the most distinguished of mankind! He had a heart that could have held the empire of the world; and, in the end, he had to content himself with a cellar. Ah, yes, we must needs pity the Opera ghost. 
           I have prayed over his mortal remains, that God might show him mercy notwithstanding his crimes. Yes, I am sure, quite sure that I prayed beside his body, the other day, when they took it from the spot where they were burying the phonographic records. It was his skeleton. I did not recognize it by the ugliness of the head, for all men are ugly when they have been dead as long as that, but by the plain gold ring which he wore and which Christine Daae had certainly slipped on his finger, when she came to bury him in accordance with her promise. 
          The skeleton was lying near the little well, in the place where the Angel of Music first held Christine Daae fainting in his trembling arms, on the night when he carried her down to the cellars of the opera-house. 
           And, now, what do they mean to do with that skeleton? Surely they will not bury it in the common grave!...I say that the place of the skeleton of the Opera ghost is in the archives of the National Academy of Music. It is no ordinary skeleton. 


1.      In The Phantom of the Opera, the reader can infer that the author:

A.    Does not believe in the Phantom

B.     Admires Erik

C.     Sympathizes with Erik

D.    Is horrified by Erik

E.     Personally knows Erik

2.      The mention of the “plain gold ring”

I.       Serves as proof to identify the Phantom

II.    Reveals that the skeleton was married

III. Represents the strength of Erik’s and Christine’s tumultuous relationship

A.    I only

B.     I and II

C.     I and III

D.    II and III

E.     I, II and III

3.      The main function of the repetition in Lines 28-30 (“and he became  . . . ordinary bricks”) is to:

A.    Create a rhythm

B.     Emphasize a desire

C.     Contrast with Erik’s “adventurous . . . life” (Line 16)

D.    Create suspense

E.     Transition into the next thought

4.      The pronoun “he” in Line 4 refers to:

A.    The speaker

B.     The Sultan

C.     The reader

D.    Erik

E.     Yildiz-Kiosk

5.      The passage contains all the following characteristics except:          

A.    First person narration

B.     Repetition

C.     Anaphora

D.    Rhetorical questions

E.      Polysyndeton

Answers to Phantom of the Opera Questions

1.      Correct Answer: C

Why: A doesn’t work because the speaker constantly references Erik by name, discusses his past and the speaker’s opinion of him. There is no textual evidence to support either B or E. The speaker is far from horrified—he shares humane details about Erik, emphasizing his wish for normalcy. So the correct answer is C as the speaker clearly states that “we must needs pity the Opera ghost” (Leroux 263), showing that he sympathizes with Erik’s predicament.

2.      Correct Answer: B

Why: The speaker recognizes the phantom “by the plain gold ring which he wore and which Christine Daae had certainly slipped on his finger” (Leroux 264), making Option I correct. Nothing in the text supports that the idea that Phantom got married; the speaker even references Erik’s unfulfilled dream of having a wife. The ring was placed on Erik post-mortem, meaning that Christine came back to Paris in order to keep her promise and bury him. So the ring signifies the strength of their bond, making Option III  right. So, B is the correct answer.

3.      Correct Answer: D

Why: The mention of building relates the sentence to the next, not the repetition of “ordinary,” eliminating E. Since the adjective doesn’t particularly draw out the sentence or build to an upcoming climax, it does not create suspense. Although the repetition does contrast with Erik’s “adventurous life” (Line 16) and can create a rhythm, that isn’t the main purpose of the literary device. It mainly functions to drive home Erik’s wish to be “‘like everybody else’” (Leroux 263), making answer D the correct answer.

4.      Correct Answer: C

Why: The novel is written in first person so the “I” mentioned in Line 5 refers to the speaker, eliminating A.  The referenced “he” helped the monarch, so the “he” can’t be the Sultan. Although there is direct dialogue with the reader, the reader never enters the story. The Yildiz-Kiosk in the following sentence is a place, not a person, making the correct answer D.

5.      Correct Answer: C

Why: Line 6, “I need only say that it was Erik,” makes it clear that the piece is told in first person. Repetition can be found in Line 28-30; it was also referenced in a previous question. Rhetorical questions can be found throughout as the speaker attempts to sway the audience’s opinion.  Lines 7-8 contain polysyndeton, making C, anaphora, the only unaccounted for literary device.  


“The Poem As Mask”
By Muriel Rukeyser
Orpheus
When I wrote of the women in their dances and
      wildness, it was a mask,
on their mountain, gold-hunting, singing, in orgy,
it was a mask; when I wrote of the god,
fragmented, exiled from himself, his life, the love gone
      down with song,
it was myself, split open, unable to speak, in exile from
      myself.
                
There is no mountain, there is no god, there is memory
of my torn life, myself split open in sleep, the rescued
      child
beside me among the doctors, and a word
of rescue from the great eyes.
 
No more masks! No more mythologies!
 
Now, for the first time, the god lifts his hand,
the fragments join in me with their own music.

Ana Sucaldito
Mrs. Wilson
AP Multicultural Literature B
15 January 2013

True or False
            Mankind strives to be honest, but in the end, everyone wears a mask. In Gaston Leroux’s The Phantom of the Opera, and Muriel Rukeyser “The Poem as Mask,” the readiness to tear down the wall between perception and reality determines the fate of those who remove their mask.
            The entire poem builds around the symbolism of mask and myths. Even the structure “The Poem as Mask” reflects this sentiment. The poem actually serves a response to a previous work of Rukeyser’s Orpheus: The Poem. Rukeyser wrote this novel, which reinterpreted Orpheus’ tale, in court masque, a form of dramatic monologue. In “The Poem of Mask,” however, she strips away this form and reveals the truth behind the novel using free verse.
            Rukeyser reveals that “when she wrote of the women . . . it was a mask” (Rukeyser 1-2). The women in this piece live in the wilderness, uninhibited. Many of Rukeyser’s works deal heavily with feminism so the women’s lifestyle, “on their mountain, gold-hunting, singing” (Rukeyser 3) could be her ideal. Her placement of the women on a mountain could symbolize that Rukeyser sees their lifestyle as momentarily unavailable; a mountain she must climb.
            For Rukeyser, casting off the mask allows the dream to become reality. The author strips away another mask as she reveals that “the god, fragmented . . . it was myself” (Rukeyser 4-7). Orpheus’ story served as a mask for her own—the women as her hopes and Orpheus as her reality. Yet, at the poem’s climax, she shouts “No more Masks! No more mythologies!” (Rukeyser 14). This one line stanza signals triumph and a conviction to live in reality. This conviction changes everything. Before, the women singing on a mountain was unattainable. But once Rukeyser resolves to no longer hide, “the fragments join in [her] with their own music” (Rukeyser 16). By accepting them as part of her reality, she heals herself, giving even the fragments their own voice, making the “women . . . singing” (Rukeyser 1-4) a reality.
            For Erik from The Phantom of the Opera, wearing a mask is the most natural thing in the world. In fact, he has multiple. Erik disguises his mortality by acting as the Opera Ghost. The Opera Ghost gives him power, power he uses to wield fear and extortion, which gives him nearly full reign of the Opera. His disguise as “[Christine’s] Angel of Music” (Leroux 93) gives him a different power. The power to get close to Christine Daaé. Finally, his physical mask allows him to be ordinary, to reach for a life of “ordinary doors and windows and a wife” (Leroux 228).
            The removal of her masks healed Rukeyser, but destroyed Erik: the difference lies in who removes the mask. Rukeyser lets her go—but Erik has his “snatch[ed] off” (Leroux 93). Christine’s horrified reaction breaks the Phantom. She doesn’t accept his reality, so neither can he. Erik loses his humanity as he fights to keep Christine in any way he can; he only regains it when Christine agrees to marry him, giving him “all the happiness the world can offer” (Leroux 253). Only then does he begin to heal again and accept himself.
             Masks conceal, but they also protect. They protect the wearer from harsh reality until they are ready to accept it. In Muriel Rukeyser’s “The Poem as Mask,” the speaker removes the mask, accepting her reality, healing herself. But, like in Gaston Leroux’s The Phantom of the Opera, when the mask is removed before the wearer is ready, the wearer can be destroyed by the reality they shunned.

The Tragedy of Macbeth (Act V, Scene 1)
By William Shakespeare
LADY MACBETH
Out, damned spot! out, I say!--One: two: why,
then, 'tis time to do't.--Hell is murky!--Fie, my
40
lord, fie! a soldier, and afeard? What need we
fear who knows it, when none can call our power to
account?--Yet who would have thought the old man
to have had so much blood in him.
Doctor
Do you mark that?
LADY MACBETH
The thane of Fife had a wife: where is she now?--
What, will these hands ne'er be clean?--No more o'
that, my lord, no more o' that: you mar all with
this starting.
50
Doctor
Go to, go to; you have known what you should not.
Gentlewoman
She has spoke what she should not, I am sure of
that: heaven knows what she has known.
LADY MACBETH
Here's the smell of the blood still: all the
perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little
hand. Oh, oh, oh!
Doctor
What a sigh is there! The heart is sorely charged.
60
Gentlewoman
I would not have such a heart in my bosom for the
dignity of the whole body.
Doctor
Well, well, well,--
Gentlewoman
Pray God it be, sir.
Doctor
This disease is beyond my practise: yet I have known
those which have walked in their sleep who have died
holily in their beds.
LADY MACBETH
Wash your hands, put on your nightgown; look not so
pale.--I tell you yet again, Banquo's buried; he
70
cannot come out on's grave.
Doctor
Even so?
LADY MACBETH
To bed, to bed! there's knocking at the gate:
come, come, come, come, give me your hand. What's
done cannot be undone.--To bed, to bed, to bed!